Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JerryBier's avatar

I also disagree with #5. I, however, see it as not so much ethnicity and hate, I see it as being rooted in religion, and therein lies the perpetual gap that will never be closed until their governments (this goes for us and the rest of the planet) are not affected by theocrats but use only reason and science as a measure of what is right and what is wrong. If you haven’t guessed by now, yes, I am an atheist. I look at history and almost every war has some religious basis for the perpetrator's lack of reasoning and not being able to see the others' point of view. Be secular. Be safe. No God, know peace.

Expand full comment
Rock_M's avatar

I find that so much of this moral allocation and balancing completely misses the only important point: namely, that this is a war. There is no morality in war. War is the absence of morality. Starting a war is immoral. Ending it is moral. That is all. The narratives of the "sides" are irrelevant.

The moral focus needs to be on ending the war by helping the Palestinians surrender the idea that their national existence requires the elimination of Jews and the Jewish state from the land of Palestine. That war was lost decades ago, but in spite of their continuous suffering, most Palestinians are still full of fight and don't want to stop. They would rather bequeath this war to their children. Which means the war will go on, and they will - of necessity - continue to suffer.

The chain of consequences over the decades of conflict have narrowed the Palestinians' options down to this one narrow path. They cannot save their children and return to the land of Palestine unless the war ends, and it cannot end until they walk that path or are pushed through it. If they surrender they can be raised up and helped. If not, not.

Expand full comment
46 more comments...

No posts